14.9.07

The world's richest Muslim tycoon

What Makes Premji a ‘Muslim tycoon’?
By Farzana Versey
September 14, 2007, Counterpunch



Is Azim Premji really the world’s richest Muslim entrepreneur? Is there a list which mentions the richest Hindu, Jew, Buddhist, Christian, Scientologist, atheist, Rastafarian?


Unlikely. At least nothing that would make the Wall Street Journal want to give it front page legitimacy. Talking of legitimacy, surely we are talking about legitimate enterprise, for the underworld and the mafia, Muslim or otherwise, are flush with money. In all likelihood, they are investors in the big companies.


Mr. Premji heads Wipro, India's third-largest IT exporter. Its fortune rests at $17 billion. I like rich people. But this gentleman is not just rich; he has been saddled with baggage. And the newspaper goes out of its way to prise it open by saying that he defies all conventional wisdom about Islamic tycoons - he does not hail from the Persian Gulf and does not wear his faith on his sleeve.


Where did the term ‘Islamic tycoon’ come from? What is unconventional about not wearing your faith on your sleeve? Is it even important to discuss?


Of course, it is. Imagine the world we are living in. Azim Premji has to be displayed as the nice guy – no beard, well-fitted suit, an amiable demeanor, likeable. He might have been a crass bore with filthy lucre, the Tom Cruise type who had to jump on an Oprah Winfrey sofa to declare his love for a Kate to become interesting. Mr. Premji has been given a moment quite unlike that cheesy one. He has been profiled (and do pardon the pun) in an article titled, “How a Muslim Billionaire Thrives in Hindu India”.


I am an Indian and have always lived in the country of my birth. It is not a Hindu nation. It may have a majority of Hindus, but then it has a majority of illiterates. Why wasn’t the report called, “How a literate billionaire thrives in illiterate India”? There are many such potential headlines I may offer, but I should hope the point has been made.


This ‘Muslim billionaire’ has thrived because he had a family business to start with. He had money to get a decent education and he had the spirit of enterprise. Hindu India did not contribute to these, neither did Muslims. It is an individual achievement.


It is unfortunate that Muslims are being made accountable for aspects of life that would under normal circumstances not identity them with religion.


Yaroslav Trofimov, the writer of the article, says, “Yet, to many in India's Muslim community, Mr. Premji's enormous wealth, far from being inspiring, shows that success comes at a price the truly faithful cannot accept. They resent that Mr. Premji plays down his religious roots and declines to embrace Muslim causes – in a nation where people are pegged by their religion and where Hindus freely flaunt theirs.”


What price has Mr. Premji had to pay? He has quietly gone and made a success of his business. There is no resentment against his hesitation to talk about his Muslim identity, and no Muslim social organisations are dependent on his largesse.


What is resented is the fact that in a country where most of the 150 million people of the community are ghettoized, the likes of Premji are touted as examples of Hindu tolerance. This just does not wash. It is most patronizing, and a huge insult to those who do make a decent living but are tagged in ways that are negative simply because they lack the visibility of a high-profile profession. On any given day there will be a handful of Muslims taken out of the celebrity closet to reveal the mothballed magnanimity of the majority community.


No one wants Premji to stand up and be counted. But there is no reason for him to play along with this secular sham, and he has been doing so for a while. He said in an interview to the paper, “We have always seen ourselves as Indian. We've never seen ourselves as Hindus, or Muslims, or Christians or Buddhists.”


The report further states, “Mr. Premji has mentioned his Muslim background so rarely in public that many Indian Muslims don't even know he shares their heritage. None of Wipro's senior managers aside from Mr. Premji himself are Muslims. The company maintains normal working hours on Islamic high holidays.”


This does not sound like a report in a respected newspaper but something straight out of a pamphlet. What heritage are we talking about? Is there one Muslim heritage? His last name could well be Hindu as his roots are in Gujarat. What is so heart-warming and significant about not working on Islamic holidays? Does it become news when many Hindu-owned companies celebrate religious festivals with a puja (prayer) and in fact during Diwali (that is an unabashed ode to the goddess of wealth) people even offer prayers to account books? Is it news that this includes Muslim entrepreneurs? What is the purpose behind such a statement? And why is it surprising considering that most of the 70,000 employees of Premji’s company are non-Muslim?


These are devious little tricks. No one mentions good old Adnan Khashoggi and his cruise liners in which the international high and mighty had fun vacations.


Isn’t there a mean between riding the Islamophobia and secular waves? The latter is as ridiculous as Mohamed al Fayed screaming about being discriminated against by British society because of his religion.


Azim Premji is a thriving businessman in the globalized world he keeps talking about. A globalized world that is unwilling to dignify him as just another wealthy guy and has to mention his religion not just in passing but as the very crux of his defiance – a defiance that is as imaginary as other stereotypes.


He says with what appears to be an element of arrogance, “All our hiring staff are trained to interview in English. They're trained to look for Westernized segments because we deal with global customers.”


Indeed. The Chinese, the Japanese, the Russians are doing rather well for themselves, and they don’t go around kowtowing to some colonial mentality that talks about English in such a fashion. He mentions that most Muslims are educated in Urdu. Perhaps he might like to check the statistics that say Urdu is a dying language. Perhaps he might like to sponsor some schools for Muslim children; he can do so incognito so that his secular credentials are safe. Perhaps he might like to know that even madrassas these days use his computers, so it is entirely possible they are cracking codes on them. Perhaps he might like to not even entertain questions about his Muslim identity. He is rich enough to afford to say, “No comments”. That is true liberation.


However, being called a Muslim tycoon is like being addressed as a hot Eskimo. And who doesn’t like a touch of oxymoron?

10 comments:

  1. I find eskimos hot...no oxymoron there,sorry. ;)
    Rather an interesting article, by the way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah...but I wasn't talking about a certain quality, merely a climatic reality. Whatever floats your boat...

    ReplyDelete
  3. For Info:

    The second para went missing for a while as CP had some problem with formatting; it is back...so you may read it again!

    ReplyDelete
  4. blog
    I think being oxymoron and being filthy rich go hand in hand....

    Always billionaires are extremely retards.........their money makes'em block their thought processes...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Circle:

    If I become a billionaire I promise not to be retarded...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Trust WSJ to innovate on a story. Premji has been a muslim all his life... he has alos been among the richest Indians for a while. Well, put the two together and you get a nice headline; right?

    ReplyDelete
  7. So reading your article it looks like you want Premji to go around telling the world that he's a muslim wheras you would like the WSJ not to.(You talk about him perpetuating a "secular sham" )

    How do you reconcile the two? OR are just randomly ranting?

    ReplyDelete
  8. You read the article? Obviously you missed large chunks...

    The "secular sham" comment came AFTER the parts that begin with, "What price has Mr. Premji had to pay?"...and ending with "No one wants Premji to stand up and be counted."

    Okay? I don't give a tosh whether he calls himself a Muslim or anything. I have a prob with WSJ talking about a how a Muslim billionaire thrives in Hindu India. That is rubbish.

    Can you reconcile the two? Or you are you just ranting about an imagined ranting you cannot deal with?

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is a good article MR. FV , Its truly sad that in the life of today it is often the case we have to sell our souls for material gains so as to speak. And the lack of a good model in the world makes it even more difficult for the heartbroken misguided youths of the world.... Perhaps some day , SOme day , and I so pray that happens, That what you feel and what you desire does become a reality , cas that is the exact same thing which I too yearn for ! Peace be upon you !

    ReplyDelete